This week is a big week for teachers in South
Dakota. After the delay tactic last week
by House Republicans, HB
1182 will be voted on (hopefully) by SD representatives. Yesterday both the Rapid
City Journal and the Sioux
Falls Argus Leader had editorials supporting this bill.
The Rapid City (RC) editorial is really gung ho about the
bill, especially because much of the funding will come “from tourists,
rallygoers and other visitors.” Really, that makes it better? Doesn’t that mean that SD is relying on
non-residents to pay for our children’s education? How cheap are we?
The RC editorial also states, “Companies and small
businesses have the same recruitment and retention concerns and wonder why they
should continue investing in a state that isn't willing to invest in public
education at the level other states do.” SD often touts its great climate for
businesses because of a lack of corporate income tax. So the businesses like
the tax breaks but are concerned about education funding? What is wrong with
this picture?
At least the SF Argus Leader pointed out flaws in HB 1182
including “Sales taxes affect the poor and working families to a greater
degree.” This is my biggest concern with
using a sales tax to fund education. This
is why I prefer SB
151, which would increase the sales tax by 1 cent but exempt certain food
items from the tax increase. This Senate
bill is brought forward by several Democrats, which makes it unlikely to be
passed by our partisan legislature. I hope it comes out of committee at least.
No comments:
Post a Comment